Sam Bankman-Fried Cites Autism Disorder As Reason To Avoid 100 Years In Prison Sam Bankman-Fried explains that his autism disorder is the reason he wants to avoid spending 100 years in prison.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of the bankrupt FTX crypto exchange, is requesting a shorter sentence due to his autism spectrum disorder. His legal team is advocating for a reduced prison term of five to six years, emphasizing his vulnerability in a prison setting compared to the recommended 110-year sentence. A recent article in Fortune Magazine stated that the legal team representing Sam Bankman-Fried argued in a sentencing memo that his autism spectrum disorder makes him more vulnerable to potential violence and extortion from fellow inmates because of his behavior. The attorneys also mentioned that he may struggle with understanding social cues and unwritten rules in the prison setting, which could result in disagreements and confrontations. The memo also discusses Bankman-Fried’s battle with anhedonic depression, which he has been treating with medication since his time in college. Additionally, Robinhood has included Solana-Based WIF alongside Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. Bankman-Fried was convicted on seven charges of fraud, including the misuse of customer funds. The accusations revolve around the inappropriate use of money for personal benefits, resulting in financial hardship for customers, including some who lost their entire life savings. Prosecutors have not yet provided their recommendations for sentencing. Letters of support should be sent to the court due to the seriousness of the charges, as the sentencing guidelines recommend a lengthy prison sentence of 110 years. Letters of support from Sam Bankman-Fried’s loved ones and acquaintances have been sent to the judge, emphasizing his strong qualities and friendly demeanor. Certain advocates claim that his autism and difficulties with social interactions increase his susceptibility to being mistreated and harassed while in prison. On the other hand, some believe that the severity of his offenses and the harm caused to the victims should take precedence over any considerations of leniency. The report also mentions that advocates argue for accommodations and support for neurodivergent individuals to ensure they are treated fairly and justly.